Monday, April 28, 2008

Batson and Janoff

This week I finished Gregory Bateson's An Ecology of Mind. It was an excellent read and really made me think about the role of the unconscious mind. After reading his book, I am thinking less about the need to make conscious all that is unconscious and see the unconscious as a part of the whole. I have already begun using his concepts of symmetrical and complementary systems in my vocabulary and work and my work team and I are thinking about strategic directions in those terms as well. Below is my concept map:










Also this week, Sandra Janoff, co-founder of Future Search, spent a few days with the EI team at work. She gave a brief history of systems theory from her perspective. Below are my notes:



Systems Theory according to Sandra Janoff
Discussion 4/24/08 with Education Initiatives Team of the Ball Foundation

Kurt Lewin
30s -40s
Group processes are patterned configurations of fields and all elements in fields are interrelated
Importance of context
Both whole and parts are equally real
Group behavior is separate and distinct from individual behavior
System and environment interact to determine behavior
Group is different than a collection of individuals


Bion
Also looking at groups as dynamically different from individuals who are its members (group has a dynamic)
Groups have internal conflicts that are different from conflicts in individuals
When energy of group is directed away from task, it isn’t random, it is organized and purposeful
4 basic assumptions about group behavior
Dependency (in relation to leader)
Counterdependency (in relation to leader)
Fight and flight (in relation to task)
Pairing (group elects two people to do work) (in relation to task)

Ludwig von Bertallanfy (60s)
Systems exist in hierarcy
Each level of system has increasing capacity
Organizing principles are same on all levels of system
Permeable boundaries
Energy transfer
Goals
Transformation
Everything is connected to everything else
(Complex Adaptive Systems are a way to understand Bertalanffy)

Gregory Bateson
Significance of cybernestic thinking
Self-regulation and feedback

Communication patterns can influence a system to change or decrease its ability to change

Miller
Translates Bertalanffy to organizations


System Elements
Goal
Roles
Boundaries
Context-relationship to environment


Wednesday, April 9, 2008

Systems KA

I finished reading The Web of Life by Fritjof Capra (see concept map below). This is actually the second time I have read it, though the first time I only read about half of the book. It was very enlightening and resonates with alot of the work I am doing with schools.

I also attended a 4 day conference (Nexus U and Nexus II) at Bowling Green State University. This was a transformative experience for me personally. This is the second annual event of bringing together people who work in change to develop a shared understanding and potentially shared practice. I think it began as a way to bring people together around whole systems change methods as described in The Change Handbook by Peggy Holman, Tom Devane, and Steven Cady. It was clear in this conference that the focus is not around technical solutions (hence Myron's opening remarks on "the tyranny of technique) but rather a interest in noticing patterns across the methods and the principles upon which they are based. Throughout the conference the arts team integrated learning and ideas in non-linquistic ways (i.e. feedback theatre, coffee filter play, etc.). The conference began with Myron's talk on systems. He introduced his information, identity and relationships model which resides with meaning, action and trust. He left us with three questions:

  • How do systems work? How does this system work? (theory, observation of particular org.)
  • How do we work the system. (practice congruent with theory)
  • How do I work in and with this system? (Coherence between authenticity and integrity in and with the system)
    How do we know?
I attended two methods sessions, one by the Human Dynamics Institute and one on Arts Integration. The Human Dynamics Institute basis their intervention on the mathematics of complexity. The presenter shared a model on organized, self-organized, and chaotic space. The Arts Integration session focused on non-linguistic ways to bring whole people into communal space. On Sunday night, all participants did a timeline (a la Future Search) to discover the lineage in the room. I can't remember the patterns we noticed over the years in the field, but it was interesting. In Open Space, I connected with two questions-Making the invisible visible? and What implications does Myron's model have for us? Both were marvelous conversations.

Making the invisible visible-in this conversation we talked about organizational culture. One example was the girl scout military/patriarchy culture. Tamara's following quote was particularly insightful "When I'm in a system, what part of me do I need to leave out of the system...what do I need to leave at the door becausethe system doesn't embrace it?" I reflected on how important it is to connect with other information systems besides our typical 5 senses. Following are a few provocative quotes from Tamara that I wanted to keep track of: "Whatt do we wish for when we make a statement like this (exploring the invisible)?Develop skills in seeing more?The invisible has energy that we haven't tapped into, that is already in the system.We conserve resources/energy. Move with what is already moving (the wave metaphor).When synchronicity is there.Not to name it or measure it.The more I graple with something, the more mysterious it is."

Implications for the identity, information, relationships model: this conversation was more about at what level do we intervene at? the top level (structures, processes, policies)? the second level information, identity, relationships? or the third, meaning, action, trust? knowing that the latter, trust, is emergent. The consensus was sort of at the second level.

Periodically throughout the 4 days I had the opportunity to be in deep reflection. The final day revealed a coming together of many parts of myself and the resonance of wholeness. I became a system, or at least recognized myself as a system, better yet I was that which is system. The integration of parts is like a symphony, a resonance of unique qualities of vibration that coexist and sing.

I also connected with some fabulous people, new friends and old. Thanks to Joann, Myron, Mary, Sandra, Tamara, Gabriel, Chris and Merling for enhancing my experience.